tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916767120530431852.post4621658665098710667..comments2024-03-23T13:03:48.917-04:00Comments on Labour Pains: Time Limit to Sue for LTD BenefitsSean Bawdenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12478582658843470140noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916767120530431852.post-78617609131881603492014-05-27T15:16:56.228-04:002014-05-27T15:16:56.228-04:00One supposes that there is always the potential of...One supposes that there is always the potential of an appeal.Sean Bawdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12478582658843470140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916767120530431852.post-23119862346133496122014-05-27T15:09:57.535-04:002014-05-27T15:09:57.535-04:00Finding a group policy of insurance to be a “busin...Finding a group policy of insurance to be a “business agreement” is nonesense. The ONSC erred in relying on Boyce. The insurance policy at issue in Boyce was a policy that covered the very business that was a party to the 'business agreement.' An LTD policy group policy clearly has an effect on an individual who needs the insurance for personal, family or household purposes. To interpret the legislation purposively, one would have to find that the business agreement except is meant to protect sophisticated business parties. It would be absurd to contend that the legislature intended to allow employers and insurance companies to conspire to deny individuals meaningful remedies for being denied something as vital as LTD insurance benefits. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com