tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916767120530431852.post5803809824323758432..comments2024-03-23T13:03:48.917-04:00Comments on Labour Pains: Dead Employee Still Entitled to Severance: JudgeSean Bawdenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12478582658843470140noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916767120530431852.post-49292499995638113902015-08-25T10:38:06.345-04:002015-08-25T10:38:06.345-04:00Thanks for sharing and keep up the good work! Who ...Thanks for sharing and keep up the good work! Who would receive the money in these kind of cases?Laura | Dutch Law Firm AMS Advocatenhttp://www.amsadvocaten.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916767120530431852.post-56871330053012296882015-08-18T10:15:36.536-04:002015-08-18T10:15:36.536-04:00My reply:
See, I don't think that point is ac...My reply:<br /><br />See, I don't think that point is actually made clear in the decision. All the court says is that the frustration must have occurred between diagnosis and death. But how long must that period be for the court to find frustration? In all causes of death, as best I understand medical science, there is a brief period during which the person is dying but not yet dead. A heart attack likely produces such a period. In such a case, could the employee's estate not take the position that employment became frustrated while the employee clutches his chest?Sean Bawdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12478582658843470140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916767120530431852.post-36384176599858096142015-08-18T10:15:23.264-04:002015-08-18T10:15:23.264-04:00Barry Fisher comments on LinkedIn:
It was not the...Barry Fisher comments on LinkedIn:<br /><br />It was not the death that triggered the payment but the illness. Had the plaintiff dropped dead from a heart attack there would have been no pay obligationSean Bawdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12478582658843470140noreply@blogger.com