Imagine, for a moment, the most ridiculous act of self-harm that an individual could do himself. Did you imagine stapling your scrotum to a 4 x 4 wooden plank, and then uploading to YouTube a video of you doing that while wearing your work shirt? Because someone actually did that, and it partially speaks to why your business or organization needs a social media policy.
An employment law resource.
Sean Bawden, Partner, Kelly Santini LLP.
sbawden@ottawaemploymentlaw.com | 613.238.6321
Sunday, 3 February 2013
Saturday, 2 February 2013
Is There a Duty on Employers to Remain Profitable?
A provocative question was asked this week: does an employer owe its employees a duty to remain
profitable? That was the question that the Honourable Justice Edward Morgan of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was
asked to answer in the recently decided case of Lochran v. Duro-Test Canada Co., 2013 ONSC 706 (CanLII).
Justice Morgan’s answer was no, it does not.
Friday, 1 February 2013
Breaking Cardinal Rule Not Just Cause
The opening words of the trial judge’s reasons for decision
in Plester v. Polyone Canada Inc., 2011 ONSC 6068 (CanLII), affirmed by the
Court of Appeal for Ontario earlier this week (2013 ONCA 47 (CanLII)) might leave some
employers with the impression that the case would be one where the court would
find just cause for dismissal: “Mr. Plester made a serious mistake at work.” Those
impressions would be mistaken.
In a decision released in late November 2011 and affirmed on
appeal on January 28th of this year, the Honourable Justice Bonnie J.
Wein held that the breaking of an employer’s “Cardinal rule” was not just cause
for dismissal.
Wednesday, 23 January 2013
Limitation Period Applicable to a Claim for Indemnification
What is the limitation period applicable to a claim for
indemnification, where the right to indemnification is contained within an
employment contract? According to a recent decision from the Honourable Justice
Heidi Polowin, Canaccord Capital Corporation v. Roscoe, 2012 ONSC 5714 (CanLII), two years from
the date upon which the employer is found liable to a third-party plaintiff.
[EDIT: The Superior Court decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal for Ontario on June 7, 2013. For a summary of that decision see: Employers Must Sue for Indemnification Within Two Years: ONCA.]
The case raises the issue of the rights of third parties and
the ability to add third parties after the expiry of limitation dates,
especially those set out in section 18 of the 2002 Limitations Act.
Saturday, 12 January 2013
Being Reprimanded for Having a Disability Stinks
Can you be fired for farting? The question may sound
childish and silly, but the answer can be serious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)