An employer’s mistake as to its legal obligations can invalidate a contractual termination provision.
In Perretta v. Rand A Technology Corporation, 2021 ONSC 2111 (CanLII), Justice Andrew A. Sanfilippo held that an employer’s refusal to pay its former employee the two weeks to which she was contractually entitled—unless she first signed a full and final release, constituted a repudiation of the employment contract, thereby entitling her to common-law damages.
A knowingly false allegation of “cause” can void an otherwise valid termination provision.
In Dixon v British Columbia Transit, [1995] BCJ No 1892 (BC SC), the British Columbia Supreme Court held that an employer could not rely on its contractual termination provision to limit its severance obligation because the contract did not provide for a measure of liquidated damages in the event of wrongful dismissal; the contract only provided for compensation in lieu of notice if dismissal was pursuant to the employer's lawful right to dismiss in the absence of cause.
As a matter of law, can the manner in which an employer dismisses an employee impact the enforceability of a contractual termination provision?
In Humphrey v. Mene, 2021 ONSC 2539 (CanLII), Justice Gina Papageorgiou, after an extensive and thorough review of applicable jurisprudence, held that, in some cases, it can.
If an employee leaves work and refuses to return until certain demands have been met, and if the employer is unwilling to meet those demands, has the employee been fired, has she quit, or what happened?
In Anderson v. Total Instant Lawns Ltd., 2021 ONSC 2933 (CanLII), Madam Justice Julianne Parfett of the Ontario Superior Court held that the employee had not been fired; her own actions had repudiated the contract.
